|
During the Cultural Revolution,
tens of thousands of teachers, politicians and artists were tortured
and killed by the Red Guards. Often good public servants were destroyed
in the process. This First Party secretary is just one of the thousands
of people to have insulting placards hung around their necks and be
publicly humiliated.
|
THE IDEOLOGY OF SAVAGERY IN COMMUNIST CHINA
In the following chapters of this
book, we shall be considering examples of the repression and torture inflicted
on the Muslims of East Turkestan. We shall also be looking at the Chinese
administration's oppression of its own people. We will show that ruthlessness
is a normal policy tool, and cruelty is regarded as nothing out of the ordinary.
In societies where the existence of God is denied, where people believe
that they have no other responsibility than to themselves, and where there
is no belief in the hereafter, selfishness, ruthlessness and cruelty take
the place of love, compassion, forgiveness, and sympathy.
The surest way of putting an end
to the cruelty and torture is for people of good conscience to explain religious
morality as part of their duty of enjoining good and forbidding evil, and
invite others to learn about the teachings of God. In one verse of the Qur'an,
God has also revealed that "Let there be a community
among you who call to the good, and enjoin the right, and forbid the wrong.
They are the ones who have success." (Qur'an, 3: 104). In carrying
out that important duty, one important stage of the war of ideas is the
total exposure of all aspects of anti-religious ideologies and the destruction
of their very foundations in order that proper morality may come to replace
them. In the case of East Turkestan and China, that ideology is communism.
According to communist ideology,
matter is all that exists and all events, historical, economic and sociological
included, are nothing but reflections of different forms of matter. This
view holds that everything is in a constant process of change and development.
The force behind the change is conflict. The entire universe, including
human history, has developed as a result of conflict, which has, in turn,
led to human progress. (see Communism in Ambush by Harun Yahya,
Global Publishing, Istanbul, 2003)
Maintaining that conflict is the
key to development is a step in the direction of endless bloodshed. Followers
of such ideologies will be in constant conflict, oppress each other and
spill one another's blood (all in the name of progress). Human feelings
upheld by religion (such as love, respect, sacrifice and sharing) disappear
entirely, together with any possibility of peace and security. In fact,
communist philosophy teaches that virtues such as these actually hold a
society back. Mao, who brought this philosophy to China, left behind him
some 60 million dead, tens of millions of people who had suffered torture,
and a ruthless society.
However, the real contradictions
and opposites that exist do not justify savagery and slaughter. Opposites
exist everywhere: Day and night, dark and light, hot and cold, good and
bad. Yet these have been created to emphasize the beauty of the world and
to allow moral virtues such as tolerance, peace and forgiveness to emerge.
The same thing applies to the world of ideas. The fact that people think or believe differently is no
reason for them to ruthlessly slaughter each other. God commands people
to behave with kindness, even to their enemies, and to speak good words
to people. All contradictions can be resolved in an atmosphere of peace
and toleration by people who possess the reason and good conscience that
Qur'anic morality brings with it.
|
Communism relies on force and violence
for its survival. Conflict and war are intrinsic elements of
communism.
|
Communism,
however, maintains the exact opposite. In fact, when conflict, which is
one of the most important components of communism, joined forces with Darwinist
thought, which regards human beings as a species of animal, the result was
the deaths of millions of people and the ruining of many more lives. That
is why the policies of Mao and his followers were not changed by the sufferings
they caused their people, whom they regarded as just a herd of animals.

The
Darwinist world view which caused Mao to regard those who opposed communism
as animals is emphasized in the book China and Charles Darwin by
James Reeve Pusey, a historian from Harvard University:
Mao
Tse-Tung in an angry moment (as late as 1964) swore that "all
demons shall be annihilated." He dehumanized his enemies, partly in traditional hyberbole,
partly in Social Darwinian "realism." Like the Anarchists, he
saw reactionaries as evolutionary throwbacks, who deserved extinction. The people's enemies were non-people,
and they did not deserve to be treated as people.3
Mao's
own words confirmed those of Pusey. One of the slogans of the founder of
Red China at that time was "The basis of Chinese socialism
rests on Darwin and the theory of evolution4
The
Muslims of East Turkestan came to be one of those societies that Mao, inspired
by the Darwinist World view, thought had no right to "be treated as
human." The reason was because the beliefs of the people of East Turkestan
led them to fiercely oppose communism. However, their rightful protest was
put down with utter ruthlessness and as a result millions of its children
have been killed by the communist regime. East Turkestan is still living
under this repression. Hundreds of thousands of Muslims have been tortured
in Chinese prisons, cast out of their homes, and obliged to leave their
land.
|
As Mao himself confessed, the
most important ideological support of the communist regime in China is
Darwin's theory of evolution. In his book China and Charles Darwin, the
Harvard University historian James Reeve Pusey describes the great
influence of Darwinism in China and how it prepared the intellectual
foundations of communism.
|
1.
A Remarkable Woman is Suppressed," The Guardian, "March 15, 2000
2. Jonathan Mirsky, "Revolution's Dark Legacy," Asiaweek, Vol.
27, No. 2, January 19, 2001 (emphasis added)
3. James Reeve Pusey, China and Charles Darwin, p. 455 (emphasis added)
4. M. Mehnert, Kampf um Mao's Erbe, Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1977 (emphasis
added)